|
Post by iPwned on Aug 14, 2009 20:45:43 GMT -7
That would probably make the late rounds a lot more manageable and a lot longer. I think they should do it.
|
|
|
Post by rwrulesrw on Aug 14, 2009 20:53:00 GMT -7
It would be better, but yet if you think about it, it would be too hard to get started. 8 people need a lot of points to get going. Things would only balance out by round 10, and by then if you dont have any points your practically screwed.
|
|
|
Post by iPwned on Aug 14, 2009 20:54:55 GMT -7
Yeah. maybe they could do maps that you could only play with 5-8 people that are the size of Seelow. That would be amazing!
|
|
|
Post by rwrulesrw on Aug 14, 2009 20:59:28 GMT -7
It would be a good idea. It would be too much of a run&gun map though. I kind of miss bunkering down for a few rounds, and having to move only when we had to.
|
|
racer1954
Recruit
i got to round29 on shi no numa on nacht i got to 57 on verrukt i got to 46 on der riese i got to 35
Posts: 0
|
Post by racer1954 on Sept 19, 2009 12:19:04 GMT -7
that would be a lot easier so then i can get past round 29
|
|
|
Post by rwrulesrw on Sept 19, 2009 15:40:45 GMT -7
K I think we went off topic just a tiny bit. Lets try and veer back onto the track.
|
|
|
Post by iPwned on Oct 3, 2009 17:26:20 GMT -7
Just a little bit... Ok. I think CoD5 should have been WWII and MW2 should be MW2. Treyarch should do past and Infininty Ward should do modern/future. That way, we get a new game engine every other year and zombies on that new engine a year after that.
|
|
|
Post by rwrulesrw on Oct 5, 2009 9:51:40 GMT -7
Like i said before, I dont think they should continue putting zombies on every WWII game they make after 5. It will probably ruin the game, and in my opinion, make it look like a joke pretty much. It would have to be at least 3x better then it was in cod5, for me to respect them putting it in cod7.
|
|